My research is generally in the area of political psychology. I developed the ideologically objectionable premise model (IOPM; Crawford, 2012; Crawford & Xhambazi, 2013) and the political person perception (P3) model (Crawford, Jussim, Madon, Cain, & Stevens, 2011) to understand how people make political judgments. I am also interested in what factors influence people's hostility towards political outgroups (Crawford, Modri, & Motyl, in press; Crawford & Pilanski, 2013a; Crawford & Pilanski, 2013b). Finally, I believe our field has disproportionately concerned itself with the psychology of the political right; I am therefore interested in exploring social psychological and personality processes across the political spectrum (Brandt, Reyna, Chambers, Crawford, & Wetherell, in press; Crawford, Jussim, & Pilanski, 2013).
- Aggression, Conflict, Peace
- Attitudes and Beliefs
- Ethics and Morality
- Group Processes
- Intergroup Relations
- Person Perception
- Personality, Individual Differences
- Political Psychology
- Prejudice and Stereotyping
- Social Cognition
Research Group or Laboratory:
- Crawford, J. T. (2012). The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 138-151.
- Crawford, J. T., & Bhatia, A. (2012). Birther nation: Political conservatism is associated with explicit and implicit beliefs that President Barack Obama is foreign. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12(1), 364-376.
- Crawford, J. T., Jussim, L., Cain, T. R., & Cohen, F. (2013). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation differentially predict biased evaluations of media reports. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 163-174.
- Crawford, J. T., Jussim, L., Madon, S., Cain, T. R., & Stevens, S. T. (2011). The use of stereotypes and individuating information in political person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 529-542.
- Crawford, J. T., Jussim, L., & Pilanski, J. M. (2013). How (not) to interpret and report main effects and interactions in multiple regression: Why Crawford & Pilanski (2013) did not actually replicate Lindner & Nosek (2009). Political Psychology.DOI: 10.1111/pops.12050
- Crawford, J. T., Leynes, P. A., Mayhorn, C. B., & Bink, M. L. (2004). Champagne, beer, or coffee? A corpus of gender-related and neutral words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(3), 444-458.
- Crawford, J. T., & Pilanski, J. M. (2013). Political intolerance, right and left. Political Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00926.x
- Jussim, L., Harber, K., Crawford, J. T., Cain, T. R., & Cohen, F. (2005). Social reality makes the social mind: Self-fulfilling prophecy, stereotypes, bias and accuracy. Interaction Studies, 6(1), 85-102.
- Jussim, L., Cain, T. R., Crawford, J. T., Harber, K., & Cohen, F. (2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes. In T. Nelson (Ed.), The Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination (p. 199-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Classic and Contemporary Issues in Social Psychology
- Design and Statistical Analysis
- Political Psychology
- The Psychology of Bias
- Undergraduate Research Seminar
Jarret T. Crawford
The College of New Jersey
2000 Pennington Road
Ewing, New Jersey 08628
- Phone: (609) 771-2117